Question
Define the claim before seeing the preferred answer.
Open discussions GLOBAL HEALTH · METHODS · EVIDENCE
GHEAS builds methods and tools that make data analysis more objective, auditable and honest about what it cannot prove.
先让证据经得起检验,再让结论被世界看见。
Statistical software can calculate an answer perfectly while the research design, measurement or interpretation remains wrong. GHEAS therefore evaluates the whole evidence chain—not just the final coefficient.
Our first PM2.5 project is preserved, but it no longer dictates the method. The new framework is specified first, implemented as software, then tested against simulations, public benchmarks and real cases.
Every decision is recorded. Every reasonable alternative remains visible. Every claim has a ceiling.
Define the claim before seeing the preferred answer.
Record where every observation and transformation came from.
Separate description, association and causal identification.
Run reasonable alternatives, placebos and failure gates.
License only the language the evidence can support.
A bilingual independent reanalysis showing how reasonable modelling choices can change the apparent health effects of an intervention.
Read and comment →02A pre-validation methodological blueprint for objective, reproducible and claim-calibrated analysis.
Explore the framework →03A bilingual dual-track reanalysis showing why a strong country-level association does not license a causal effect claim.
Read and comment →04A protocol-led review examining how design and measurement choices shape published health estimates.
Follow the research trail →04 — THE GHEAS STANDARD
“The purpose is not to produce a more impressive answer.Read the bilingual method paper ↗
It is to produce the most defensible answer the evidence allows.”